![]() ![]() “Part of the poorer performance is due to the fact that students struggling in their face-to-face courses are disproportionately being provided with online learning opportunities, and these struggling students are all too often being placed in virtual options that lack the student supports necessary for improving student learning.” Joe Friedhof, confirms that districts without adequate resources tend to push students into cheaper virtual environments. Writing in the Lansing State Journal, Michigan Virtual’s VP, Dr. Based on Michigan’s data, one might argue instead that the education medium truly does not matter as much as the learner’s socioeconomic background. It seems almost quaint to think that, just over ten years ago, the debate over K-12 online learning would center around whether and how kids use the internet. Indeed, whereas librarians often have the upper hand on their patron’s library kung-fu (as expressed to me by a friend in Library Science), the reverse is true when it comes to teenagers and the online world: more often than not, they outclass their older taskmasters.” In response, Ars Tecnica’s Ken Fisher mused, “ew kids have to be dragged online in the way that they have to be dragged to the library. When the online learning requirement became law in 2006, many lawmakers were very optimistic.Īccording to Michael Flanagan, State Superintendent of Public Instruction and member of the Michigan Virtual University (MVU) Board of Directors in a release at the time, “The importance of requiring all students to take an online course today can be compared to the efforts to teach young people how to use print resources in a public library 50 years ago.” A Law that Sidestepped Expectation Former Governor Jennifer Granholm spearheaded the Michigan Merit Curriculum. Still, they only accounted for 4% of the state’s virtual enrollment in the previous school year. ![]() Michigan Virtual-which also creates numerous online courses-exhibited a total pass rate of 81%. It’s also difficult to quantify online learning generally in the state because students can choose from so many different course providers. Nearly half of Michigan’s virtual students took and passed all over their online courses. ![]() Over a quarter of schools with a student virtually enrolled-27%-had a pass rate of 90%-100%. For these students, the pass rate was 48%.īut there were also several other significantly more optimistic takeaways. The report also found that students living in poverty made up the majority of the online enrollment at 62%. Roughly one quarter of these students did not pass any online classes at all. The pass rate for these students was 55%. ![]() The Online Learning Requirement, 12 Years OnĪccording to the report, roughly 101,000 students took an online course in the 2016-2017 school year. But recent data suggest that the program hasn’t had the results lawmakers were hoping for.Ī report by Michigan Virtual, a leading non-profit dedicated to online learning in the state, describes a varied eLearning landscape replete with some mountains, valleys, and plateaus, so to speak. Known as the online learning requirement, it was intended to onboard students for a future of lifelong learning and a workplace that will exist largely online. The revamp required students to complete upper level STEM subjects and, among other things, take at least one online class. In 2006, the state of Michigan passed a controversial piece of education legislation known as the Michigan Merit Curriculum. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |